The Baltimore Sun
Picture this. The nation’s children are drinking on average what amounts to a bathtub full of sugary beverages every year. That’s 30 gallons of soda, sports drinks and probably the biggest healthy drink fraud of all, fruit juice.
The American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Heart Association painted this vivid visual recently as they announced what is probably the most aggressive proposition ever by national health organizations to curb consumption of the sugary drinks that are wreaking havoc on children’s health.
The groups suggested an excise tax on such drinks, making water and milk the default beverages on children’s menus and in vending machines, requiring hospitals to discourage purchases of unhealthy beverages and making sure nutritional information is visible on restaurant menus and advertisements.
They also want the federal and state governments to push to limit the marketing of these drinks to children and teens and for federal nutrition programs to discourage sugary drinks. For instance, low-income families can currently buy soda with their SNAP benefits.
We welcome the call of action from the medical doctors who see firsthand every day the health impact of such drinks and whose stance can help bolster the push to rein in the forceful marketing tactics used by the beverage industry.
These drinks amount to nothing but empty calories with little or no nutritional value, and beverage companies spend millions — $866 million in 2013 — to get kids hooked no them. Dietary guidelines recommend that children and teens consume fewer than 10 percent of calories from added sugars, but they consume about 17 percent, and nearly half of that comes from drinks
This is only setting children up for a lifetime of health failures that include dental problems, heart disease and obesity, among other issues.
The recent announcement marks the first time the two groups have proposed excise taxes, which proved successful in some states, including reducing the amount of sugary beverages bought in both Berkeley, Calif., and Philadelphia.
Still, regulating sugary drinks usually ignites controversy, and any effort is likely to face intense pushback and lobbying from the beverage industry. The Beverage Association sued the city of San Francisco for violating its First Amendment rights for requiring labels that warn of the health consequences of drinking sodas and other beverages. The beverage trade group also sued the city of Philadelphia over its soda tax.
For those who argue that the government shouldn’t be in the business of telling people what to eat, we say that it is indeed their job to protect the public health of the country’s citizens.
We hope the endorsement by the health groups gives more ammunition to those who care about kids’ health. The groups are modeling their effort after the previous public health assault on the tobacco industry, which put up similar defenses when health groups strived to reduce tobacco use among kids. The health community kept on fighting, and those efforts eventually paid off.
